Subject	Despite the relative hype of the ARC ICs:
Posted by	therinL on January 13, 2004 at 8:22 AM
	This message has been viewed 77 times.
In Reply To	Possible Fuel for the SMIC VS FMIC debate? posted by TritonZ on January 13, 2004 at 07:33 AM
Message	Ive always been a bit weary of them. I should say that Ive never personally driven a car with them in, or seen any dyno results, but from the pictures Ive seen portray them as having less frontal surface area and less overall volume than some of the other vendors, and for the price, I am adamant that they are *NOT*worth it! Id be intersted to see those test results performed with a set of Stillen ICs instead of the ARC ICs. And Id also like to see the test performed by someone else. That guy that posted to that board seeemed a bit....off... =)
Follow Ups	Possible Fuel for the SMIC VS FMIC debate? - TritonZ 07:33:43 01/13/04 Despite the relative hype of the ARC ICs: - therinL 08:22:15 01/13/04 He Ownes UAS, a large manufacturer of Z parts - TritonZ 08:37:10 01/13/04 Yea I know who he is =) - therinL 08:48:35 01/13/04 mmm that I dont know - TritonZ 08:52:19 01/13/04 the ones painted were the old model (n/m) - tech9 10:34:41 01/13/04 Im aware of this: - therinL 11:20:18 01/13/04 it may be a thermal dispersion coating (n/m) - fourZero 12:43:28 01/13/04 The measurements are on splparts.com... - Only1Z 19:29:40 01/13/04 why dont you just buy some SMIC's, take temp readings, dyno - ScubaSteve 09:31:11 01/13/04 Thats what UAS has really done - TritonZ 10:09:59 01/13/04 Do you think that a chassis dyno - RSR 11:07:50 01/13/04 agreed - aliaZ 11:22:18 01/13/04 tru dat, how about 1/4 mile race for each, instead of dyno? (n/m) - ScubaSteve 11:54:12 01/13/04 bingo (n/m) - Spee 18:57:07 01/13/04 You are correct, sir! (n/m) - Only1Z 19:30:24 01/13/04
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.